Tiger Woods new Golf Swing
Tiger, Tiger Woods Ya’ll...
Printed From: One Plane Golf Swing
Category: Members Vault Forum
Forum Name: Member Vault General Forum
Forum Discription: Private forum where Chuck Quinton answers questions directly for Vault members
URL: http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2391
Topic: Tiger, Tiger Woods Ya’ll...
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Subject: Tiger, Tiger Woods Ya’ll...
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 6:15pm
For you Chris Rock, fans, you'll get the subject heading. Anyway, I got some great footage of Tiger working at Hank Haney's place in Texas and have been studying it and wanted to share it with the Vault members. Here are some screen shots with some discussion. So what exactly is Tiger doing with his swing these days? He's made big changes from his days with Butch. Tiger's address position always looks good, the guy came out of the womb holding a 2 iron. So what things stick out? First, his spine angle. I measure him at a pretty healthy 40 degrees or so, so he's got a fair amount of tilt for what Hardy considers to be a two plane swing. His shoulders are out over his toes and his rear is to the "rear", somewhat sticking out. From down the line, it's a perfect one plane setup. From face on, his spine is pretty near vertical, there's not much tilt at all away from the target and this puts his arms and club in a "Y" postion more so than the classic reverse "K" for a two planer. His right leg is angled in, much like how Hogan talked about in his book. Hands are a bit inside the left thigh more so than a lot of a two planers, more centered in front of chest than being in a straight line with his left arm. Now for the takeaway: There aren't too many top pros that let the club get inside their hands during the takeaway and Tiger is no different. His club works absolutely perfectly up the shaft angle from address and is perfectly inline with his hands. His left arm is more into his body than it used to be, but not as much as Hardy would like. I would consider this somewhat neutral between being close to your right thigh as Hardy advocates in a one plane swing and straight down the line in a two plane swing. From the face on view, he's stayed perfectly centered and rotated around his spine and his right arm is starting to fold rather than extend down the line like it used to. Right past this point the club goes perfectly through his right forearm and is perfectly parallel to the shaft plane: His arms are still working around behind him while he stays centered and rotates. At 9 o'clock his hands are more in front of his chest than what Hardy would want. His club is almost perfectly parallel to the shaft plane. ------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Replies:
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 6:28pm
At the top of his swing, admire this: His left arm and the club are perfectly parallel to the shaft plane he started out with at address. This is why he has that laid off look at the top and a more flat, roundish look. His left arm happens to be fairly close to parallel with his shoulders, but Haney couldn't care less about that. He's really trying to create a geometrically efficient movement keeping everything what he considers on plane or parallel to that plane. During his downswing, no secret here, he's got the club perfectly parallel to the shaft plane at this point in the swing. Note how much Tiger has gotten into his left side, he looks like Hogan in his lower body. He still has a lot of width with those arms working down and in front of his chest. At this point in his downswing, he has the club back perfectly on plane. His shoulders are still very closed to the target to give his arms more time to get back in front of his chest, while his hips are open, a very dynamic position. Probably not much of a surprise here, his club matches up identically with where it was at address, and his hands are in front of his chest with his right arm quite straight. This is a "push" release of the club and is great for controlling trajectory. Very interesting stuff. Tiger keeps the club on plane throughout every possible place in the swing. Theoretically, it should be incredibly efficient but I'm not sure theory and biomechanics totally mesh up here. I always wonder what would have happened had Tiger just stuck with his 2nd swing he built with Butch. Tiger sounded frustrated this past weekend with his swing at the Players Championship and I wonder how long he's going to stick with this swing. Time will tell... ------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: wannabe
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 6:37pm
Great footage, thanks for the explanations. I agree with the theory and biomechanics bit. He should be hitting everything perfectly. Just shows that we can't be perfect, and even if we were, it doesn't guarantee perfect golf. |
Posted By: willrob
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 6:58pm
very nice footage. thanks Chuck! that is very interesting, tiger looks so solid in all those positions yet he can sure hit some shots that would make you think otherwise. |
Posted By: Winfinancial
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 8:21pm
Ok Chuck, What if Tiger is ready to make another switch and this time he calls you. Based on what you see on the above, what advice would you offer to make Tiger better? Just focus on the full swing. No putting. No mental stuff. What is missing or offline, in your opinion? ------------- Winfinancial 8.5 hdp |
Posted By: roverbob
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 8:28pm
i dont think tiger will agree to passive hands...he's just so used to racing his arms, hands, body, hips altogether....would be interesting tho |
Posted By: waltice
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 8:35pm
Just an observation I have noticed about Tiger when he is swinging well and when he is spraying it all over the place. When Tiger's flow is on meaning, when he does not appear to be lashing at the ball he seems like he never misses. I remember watching him at the Funai this year during his warm up session on the range. I swear his flow is the best I have every seen, it is better than Ernie's or Freddy's, it is simply the best!!! But as soon as he got onto the course is flow and rhythm completely changed. Just something I noticed and wanted to share with everyone. Don't get me wrong I would LOVE to have his problems right now and be the #1 golfer on the planet by double digits. It is something I noticed and probably the only thing I would suggest to Tiger do if for some odd reason he asked me. |
Posted By: willrob
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:21pm
Waltice Very interesting, but I have noticed that as well. I have never seen tiger in person on the range but the footage I've seen of him on the driving range numerous times is amazing. His flow is so good, so smooth! I've asked myself the same question, why does it seem to change so much when he gets to the course, it seems as if he gets on the course and thinks, i gotta hit it 10x as far as I was on the range. Will |
Posted By: flyfishin
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:22pm
The timing of this post is interesting. I read a Golf Digest article earlier this week where it talked about Hank Haney's swing beliefs. It matches this perfectly. In the article it talked about how Haney teaches a one plane swing with the one plane being the shaft plane at address just as you noted. He wants the club to remain on that plane at all times. Looks like Tiger executes that perfectly. |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:28pm
Ha! I don't see Tiger beating down my door anytime soon, but the answer would be obvious. Let me explain. I've seen Tiger countless times in person on the range, at the course, etc. He used to come and hit balls where I used to teach here in Windermere with O'Meara. Out of every shot I EVER saw him hit on the range, I NEVER ONCE saw him miss a shot. Never. Out on the course, I've seen him dump it in the water on 6 at Bay Hill last year, I've seen him snipe hook several drives, block fades, you name it. I wouldn't touch his swing. How do you improve on that? It's Nick Price without getting steep on the way back and with an added dose of power and Nick was one of the best iron players of all time. When it comes down to it, I can't think of more than one shot I've ever seen a tour pro miss on the range. That was Sergio about 5 years ago at Castle Pines and hit a big hook when he was really struggling with his swing. Outside of that, they all look the same on the range, some slightly higher, some slightly lower, some fall off to the right, some fall off to the left, but watching them on the range you wonder how they don't all shoot 58 each round. So, what would I work on with Tiger? I'll give you one guess... ------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: wannabe
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:32pm
HaHA Putting? |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:35pm
BTW, I just put Tiger's swing up in the Vault under Member's Swings. Ok, he's not a member, yet... Ummm, I went ahead and put him in the 0-10 Handicap group.
------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:37pm
wannabe... Man, you failed miserably! Guess I'll have to give you two guesses! You had so much potential, too...
------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: Bob34
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:41pm
I know this isn't what you're talking about Chuck but I'm surprised you wouldn't want to get his hands lagging a bit more to get rid of some of the timing that could go wrong when his "mental' game isn't on... -Bob
|
Posted By: willrob
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:42pm
I'd guess MUSHIN! Am I right chuck, what do I win? |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:45pm
willrob, you win the ultimate prize. You know what the best player in the world struggles with in his game and he doesn't even know it. Now you can go practice it and be ahead of the curve. He used to focus on it, now he feels that if just hit the ball the way he wanted to every time he wouldn't have to worry about it. I give him an "A" for persistence... Or is it obstinence? Either way, he's at the head of the class.
------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:47pm
Bob, His swing is so grooved and pure, why change what works? And man, does it work -- on the range, anyway... ------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: willrob
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 9:57pm
thanks chuck... Ya, I do need to work on that for sure, its just hard to get yourself to do. I dont know why, when you know you're gonna hit the ball better than if you sit there and try to work on your swing. I guess the big thing is, when you work on your mechanics, dont worry bout the ball flight, just work on the mechanics, and then when you're done, MUSHIN golf and thats it. Right??? Will |
Posted By: Winfinancial
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 10:22pm
Ok Chuck, I get it Mushin again. But man you really need to work on your magic widget or swing shell game if you want the big bucks to compete with the "Top 10" instructors. They all keep their pros on the merry go round of golf "let's try this today" You are going the wrong way Chuck to simplification instead of TGM complexity. Ha, Ha. Maybe that scalabilty factor does up a bunch CQ with Mushin. ------------- Winfinancial 8.5 hdp |
Posted By: wannabe
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 10:24pm
Or is it 'Just work on mushin, and the mechanics will take care of themselves' ? |
Posted By: roverbob
Date Posted: 30 March 2006 at 11:34pm
I just viewed the video....hmmm...its very different when he's actually playing...this seems to be a very controlled shot...body was "quiet". This video , for what purpose if i may ask? (dont think he went to golf store trying out clubs and they took a video ) |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 8:10am
Yeah, this was Tiger at Golfsmith trying out some Callaway Lady Gems. Just kidding. This is at Hank Haney's golf ranch in Texas working on his swing with Hank. Mechanics are important, work them on the range, but even there you have to let go and hit some "trusting" shots where your mind is clear. Tiger's mechanics are already flawless. There are many, many ways to swing a club, far more than what Hardy has laid out in his book. This is a mechanically perfect golf swing that simply falls more into a two plane model, but doesn't fit perfectly into that. As far as what Hank Haney teaches, it's dead on and it works. But, as you can see, it relies on good tempo and timing to get the club to work perfectly along that plane. He has great hands and can pull it off. The problem is Tiger on the range who is smooth, silky and effortless is not the same Tiger on the course. If it was, I can't imagine him ever missing a green or fairway. Admittedly, my "business plan" here is not real sound. I don't want some stupid gimmick just to try and attract a pro. No dumb training aid or complex swing theories. I'm all about application of theory, whether it be my own or someone else's. What works in the real world? That's probably more my motto and I use myself as a "test dummy". My goal is not to be a top 10 instructor, my goal is to truly help a lot of golfers get more enjoyment out of the game. I realize that's a hard sell for a business, but I just can't STAND the so called "top 10". These guys on TV each week drive me crazy because they're so full of %*&! Not a one can play good golf, but they're all so willing to throw out how they're theory is right and everyone else is wrong, even though they can't prove it. The truth is there are a million ways to swing the club and no golf instructor with a clue should ever hang their hat on "one right way" to swing the club, although almost all that I know do. Hardy atleast through out two, but his theory has more exceptions than rules. What about Tiger's swing? It obviously works when Tiger is in sync and swinging under control but it's not a pure one or two plane swing. Trying to categorize just by that makes it just look like a hybrid mess. But, draw a couple plane lines and you realize just how incredibly precise a plane the club is being swung on and that alone warrants yet another valid swing theory model that is not fair to be called a two plane swing. I guess, in the end, I'm more of a golf "anti-instructor". I don't even like to be called an instructor, I've just known too many. Perhaps I should turn my title into a symbol, from now on I shall be known as ~`|/~, the anti-instructor ------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: monkeyboy
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 8:26am
I completely agree. A nice smooth unhurried rhythm can hide a multitude of sins that, from my experience, only rear their ugly heads when the pressure is on. CQ's approach, to me, is one of reducing these faults by reducing the amount of manipulation required during the swing and finding a way to reduce that 'pressure' on the course. Maybe that should be the other way around eh? I see this as a path that I could find my way down alone (eventually), but any guidance (as opposed to instruction) I can take from people who are in the same boat is going to speed up the process. PS. Nice one. Like 'the instructor formally known as Chuck'? That's the wrong way round as well isn't it? PPS. I thought 'Ladies' Gems' was a euphemism for... well... you work it out.
|
Posted By: gator
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 11:01am
This has been one of the best threads in a while. The Tiger analysis, coupled with a thread earlier in the week on the merits of the flow and rythem drill have been excellent. I had kind of forgotten about the flow drill and when I practiced it this week I realized that I lost some extension with my left arm on the backswing. A little too mechanical I suppose. Tiger's extension was pretty dramatic. His arms are pretty long and although I have to be careful not to overdo it, the importance of a straight, not stiff, left arm are obvious. |
Posted By: arbano1
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 11:37am
Originally posted by Chuck Quinton
Yeah, this was Tiger at Golfsmith trying out some Callaway Lady Gems. Just kidding. This is at Hank Haney's golf ranch in Texas working on his swing with Hank. Mechanics are important, work them on the range, but even there you have to let go and hit some "trusting" shots where your mind is clear. Tiger's mechanics are already flawless. There are many, many ways to swing a club, far more than what Hardy has laid out in his book. This is a mechanically perfect golf swing that simply falls more into a two plane model, but doesn't fit perfectly into that. As far as what Hank Haney teaches, it's dead on and it works. But, as you can see, it relies on good tempo and timing to get the club to work perfectly along that plane. He has great hands and can pull it off. The problem is Tiger on the range who is smooth, silky and effortless is not the same Tiger on the course. If it was, I can't imagine him ever missing a green or fairway. Admittedly, my "business plan" here is not real sound. I don't want some stupid gimmick just to try and attract a pro. No dumb training aid or complex swing theories. I'm all about application of theory, whether it be my own or someone else's. What works in the real world? That's probably more my motto and I use myself as a "test dummy". My goal is not to be a top 10 instructor, my goal is to truly help a lot of golfers get more enjoyment out of the game. I realize that's a hard sell for a business, but I just can't STAND the so called "top 10". These guys on TV each week drive me crazy because they're so full of %*&! Not a one can play good golf, but they're all so willing to throw out how they're theory is right and everyone else is wrong, even though they can't prove it. The truth is there are a million ways to swing the club and no golf instructor with a clue should ever hang their hat on "one right way" to swing the club, although almost all that I know do. Hardy atleast through out two, but his theory has more exceptions than rules. What about Tiger's swing? It obviously works when Tiger is in sync and swinging under control but it's not a pure one or two plane swing. Trying to categorize just by that makes it just look like a hybrid mess. But, draw a couple plane lines and you realize just how incredibly precise a plane the club is being swung on and that alone warrants yet another valid swing theory model that is not fair to be called a two plane swing. I guess, in the end, I'm more of a golf "anti-instructor". I don't even like to be called an instructor, I've just known too many. Perhaps I should turn my title into a symbol, from now on I shall be known as ~`|/~, the anti-instructor Here is a guy I used to take lessons with. He calls himself the Anti-Pro. He teaches the two-plane swing, although he doesn't call it that. There aren't too many people out there who make learning the golf swing as simple as he does. I used to play very well using his method, but my curiousity got the best of me. He used to always tell me to avoid reading golf magazines, watching videos or taking lessons because it would just screw me up more. I didn't heed his warning and am just now getting over paralysis analysis by working with Chuck. http://www.theantipro.com/ ------------- What's my target? |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 12:33pm
That's funny, I read his article about the PGA pro. I had a guy book me for a lesson this year, on his way over he asked if I was a PGA pro and I told him no. He said, "Oh. Well, I guess I'm going to have to cancel then." I just couldn't help but laugh.
------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 12:39pm
by the way, his "perfect" swing is perfect if you have great rhythm and great hands like he does. classic two plane.
------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: 55Preakness
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 1:18pm
CQ- I am vaguley aware of the level of training it takes to be a PGA Pro. And I am not doubting your business model, but do you lose "clients" b/c you are not a PGA Pro? If not, then so what, if so then why not? |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 2:20pm
He's the only person I know of that didn't come for a lesson because of that. I've managed to survive since then. My schedule is booked, end of story.
------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: 55Preakness
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 2:27pm
That is what I thought. So, why worry. |
Posted By: gwlee7
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 2:34pm
Hey Chuck, I want a refund!!!!!1111 |
Posted By: mgivney
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 5:25pm
Hi Chuck, I was reading your thoughts about Mushin golf and it dawned on me....can it be equated to a cerebral version of Happy Gilmore's "Happy Place"?? You know...with his girlfriend in lingerie holding pitchers of beer, a little person riding a stick-horse and his grandmother hitting the jackpot on the slots. Sorry I couldn't resist. Matt |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 5:31pm
Matt, LOL, umm, sort of! But then you'd have to be thinking about the girl in the lingerie... ------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: dougw
Date Posted: 31 March 2006 at 10:39pm
Chuck It looks to my "all knowing, professional, PGA instructor" eye, that in your last frame of Woods' swing his LEFT shoulder is moving in more of an "upright, to the sky, down the line ,2P direction," as opposed to a "turn or rotate behind the body" 1P move. And if you'll draw your magic colored lines over his spine angle comparing address with the last frame, I think you'll find that his spine angle has tilted back not just a little at impact, but significantly, thus a posible slide. Your thoughts? dw ------------- Pray for a good crop, but keep hoein' while your prayin' |
Posted By: One Planer
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 7:31am
Originally posted by Chuck Quinton
BTW, I just put Tiger's swing up in the Vault under Member's Swings. Ok, he's not a member, yet... Ummm, I went ahead and put him in the 0-10 Handicap group. Is that 0 to +10? If so, I think you have him in the right category. |
Posted By: Chuck Quinton
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 8:20am
doug, Tiger works to get his arms in front of his body at impact and to keep the club always on plane, he couldn't care less about any of Hardy's ideas. I would say he keeps his spine angle beautifully, but works to keep his shoulders square at impact rather than open, but the club definitely works left and on the exact same plane as the downswing. If you look at the top his followthrough, his right arm is on the exact same plane his left arm was on the backswing. Incredibly symmetrical. ------------- Current USGA Handicap +.2 http://www.oneplanegolfswing.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3130&PN=1 - See what's in my bag! Scoring Avg. 72.92, GIR 65%, FIR 65.71%, Putts 30.38 |
Posted By: acepepper
Date Posted: 03 April 2006 at 12:44pm
Getting back to Tiger, I think his biggest problem is that he's not content with just being the best golfer in the world, which he obviously is. He wants to be the best at every single aspect of the game; the longest driver, the best iron player, the best around the greens and the best putter. I think he hates the fact that there are guys coming through now, who have more power and distance than him, hence his tendancy to lash at the ball with his driver, causing all sorts of inconsistency. It's the old ego thing. He's just got to play within himself and he'll win everything. Forget the extra distance Tiger, you don't need it. |
Posted By: Knock It Stiff
Date Posted: 03 April 2006 at 2:04pm
Ace, I agree with you about the driver. Tiger could give up some distance for the sake of accuracy and he would probably win every time he teed it up. He is so deadly accurate with his irons, and we all know about his short game and putting. Lord help the rest of the tour if he gets his driver under control.....
|